Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 28, 2016, for obstructing the execution of official duties in the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on November 5, 2016, and is still under the suspended sentence.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30, at the Daegu-gu 2018 Daegu apartment shopping mall, the Defendant: (b) requested the victim E (n, 22 years of age) who is an employee of the relevant place to provide brecing brecing brecing in the display stand; (c) while drinking brecing brecing the brecing, the Defendant changed the brecing of the brecing, the brecing, the brecing, the 300s, the same year;

200 200 202

The breath of this breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath and the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the same date and time as paragraph 1, and at the same place as 112, and received a report from FJ 4 Team Assistant G (42 tax) of FW 13 Team G (42 tax) of FW 4 Team G (PP) called “an employee under the influence of alcohol will not desire and avoid disturbance.” On the other hand, the Defendant was guilty of murdering with me to see the words “constition that would have interfered with the performance of duties,” and “constience that would have interfered with the performance of duties.”

By doing so, the Democratic Police only died of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch xbbbbb, which seems to be flick xbbb, which caused the threat of doing so, and the left part of the police officer was assaulted once by buckbbbb.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the same final judgment and confirmation during the period of suspension of execution);

1. Articles 136(1) and 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.