A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of the performance of deceptive scheme performance or interference with business, for six months, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of the performance of deceptive scheme performance on May 14, 2015 at the court of first instance at the court of first instance, which became final and conclusive on September 15, 2015, and completed the execution of each of the above sentence in the prison of North Korea (U.S.) on September 14, 2016. On February 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of the performance of deceptive scheme performance or interference with business, and the said sentence was finally finalized on August 31, 2018.

1. On December 6, 2018, the Defendant made a false report to the Busan Regional Police Agency 112 Report Center as a mobile phone in front of the Busan Central Police Station B district (U.S., Busan Central Police Station C) on the front of the Busan Central Police Agency B district, and made a false report to the effect that “The number of people who seem to have terrorismed the computer network of the D bank would make cyber terrorism on E alcohol house at around 11:00, Jan. 25, 2019, the Defendant sent two police officers belonging to the Busan Central Police Station B district, and called the Busan Central Police Station B District for emergency call.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 reported report and the handling of the case.

2. On December 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 05:00, when she entered a b district zone; (b) followed the luxur F (hereinafter “F”) who had been working in the said district; and (c) she expressed the Defendant at the b district zone. The Defendant expressed the bath theory that “I am equally hurbly hump. h. h. h. h. h. s. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.) and continued to walk the b district zone, she walked three times at the b

This is the defendant.