beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following order of payment shall be revoked, and
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 16, 2011, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit of KRW 3 million, monthly rent of KRW 250,000,000, and two years of lease from the Defendant, Busan-gun, Busan-gun, (hereinafter “601”) and occupied the Plaintiff upon delivery on February 16, 201. (B) The Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to resolve the hot water problem in the event that the hot water was not supplied after moving into the 601. The Defendant sent text messages to the effect that there was no way to resolve the hot water problem to the Plaintiff on March 14, 201, and the Plaintiff deducted the Plaintiff from March 15, 201. Meanwhile, on December 24, 2010, the Plaintiff set the lease deposit of KRW 304,00,000 (hereinafter “the lease deposit of KRW 304,404,000,000,000).
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings]
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment
A. As the alleged Defendant did not resolve the hot water problem, the Plaintiff was a director at least three times in around March 201, around November 201, around April 201, and around April 2012, and the director at around May 201 in 404 and around May 201, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 900,00 (300,000 x 303 times) and KRW 504,00,000,000 for the director expenses at KRW 601 and KRW 404,00,000 for the director expenses at KRW 1.4 million.
B. (1) On March 15, 2011, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to resolve the hot water problem after moving into the 601th 601, but the Defendant did not resolve it. As seen earlier, the facts between the directors in March 15, 201 are as follows: (a) No. 3-2 of the evidence No. 3-2 (when considering the overall purport of the pleadings in the receipt, the Plaintiff’s payment of KRW 300,000 to the director’s expenses, and thus, the Defendant is liable for damages to the Plaintiff.