logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고정3410
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the auditor of "E", a group of women's apartment management directors in Busan Association area, and the victim F (V, 50 years old) is the chairperson of the above E.

1. The Defendant committed a crime in November 2014, by phoneing the said E-ray G in the vicinity of the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, and doing the same act as the F’s privacy is complicated and gling, among those on November 2014.

The purport was that the South-North H and Ha, Samsung president, and Samsung were received KRW 500,000,000.

However, the victim F does not have rights and rights, and there is no 50,000 won after the Samsung president and the Samsung president.

Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

2. On December 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime in Francing on December 2, 2014, at a meeting room for the representatives of occupants of the second apartment in Busan Eastdong-gu; (b) “F,” a member of the said E, went back to the meeting by cutting away the pet of the workplace rent, thereby getting back to the other head of the remaining son; and (c) went on a double bridge.

60,000 won was paid twice in relation to male and female and 50,000 won.

In fact, however, the victim F did not have any spawn or any spawn with the male president, and there was no money in return for the sex with the 60th male.

Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

3. On December 29, 2014, the Defendant, who committed a crime, called the Defendant at around December 29, 2014, in the residence of the Defendant located in Busan Y-gu, Busan J around December 29, 2014, called the “F” to K who is a member of the E, and “F disturbs male relations, gals and girls.

The purport was that male relations and 50,000 won were received.

However, in fact, the victim F has not received 500,000 won in return for sexual intercourse with male.

Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Recordings and tape-recordings 1.

arrow