logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.04.02 2012고정295
명예훼손
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In February 2012, Defendant B had no fact that the victim E had livedd with another male, Defendant B, who had been Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, 302 Dong 1101, and had damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts with the victim’s reputation, despite the fact that the victim E had not livedd with the other male.

2. In March 2012, Defendant A, on the first corridor No. 302, 1101, which was Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts with the victim’s former husband, “The complainant, who was her husband, was her husband at any time during the month, was her husband, and was her husband.”

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning resident registration, marital relation certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The Defendants and the defense counsel on the assertion of the Defendants and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Republic of Korea asserts that the Defendants did not indicate false facts since the victims were able to live in the middle of the other male and field, but the Defendants dialogueed as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, but the Defendants merely divided the conversation between the persons in a relative relationship with each other.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that Defendant B was a policeman in February 2012 can be acknowledged to Defendant A, despite the fact that the victim had not livedd with another male.

In addition, the public performance of defamation by publicly alleging false facts under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Code is unspecified.

arrow