The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On November 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, the facts charged in the instant case: (b) around 19:00, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant was able to enter the instant case on the male bridge, and her chest and her chested on the instant male bridge, with a view to having been able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to have been able

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. We examine the judgment, and the crime of defamation as stated in the above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim prepared a letter of withdrawal of complaint on March 30, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case, that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant. Since the above agreement was submitted to this court on March 31, 2015, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.