logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.02.08 2018고정885
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who engages in game products distribution business under the trade name of “B.”

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the rating received from a member of the game products management committee for distribution or use, or display or store them for such purpose to hinder the distribution order of the game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendant posted an article on the sales of a game machine under the said Act, “D,” which is a cyber site specialized in the sale of the game machine, to supply and distribute the game products opened and altered to facilitate money exchange business to the game room operators who communicate with the said article, by putting up a notice on the sales of the game machine under the said Act, “D”.

1. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested the lease of the game machine called “I” from H operating the game room with the trade name “G” at the office of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and E-B; and (b) leased and supplied 40,000 won deposit money and 300,000 won daily rent for the altered game machine so that the user of the game products can verify the accumulated score (repaid score) obtained differently from the rating received from the Game Management Committee.

2. On August 27, 2017, the Defendant continued to receive a request from H to “J” for a telephone call for the game machine’s program leased as referred to in the former “A” from “I” to “J”, and the Defendant also changed all the game products “I” installed in the previous game machine to “J” in order to verify the accumulated points (reward points) obtained by the game user unlike the rating received by the game work management committee.

Accordingly, the defendant is different from the rating received by the Game Industry Management Committee.

arrow