The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts (i.e., misunderstanding of facts) the injured part of the instant case: (a) the injured part D was engaged in flabing the Defendant’s flab and flabing the flab; (b) the injured part flabed self-injury by the victim himself; and (c) the injured part was flabed by the police station in order to report the above act of the victim and to file a complaint against the crime of unafladation

The victim G was first flicking on the wind that the Defendant was flicking and pushed down, and the Defendant was also flicking on the flicks of the victim. Rather, the Defendant was flicked on the wall flicks and flicked on the wall flicks, and there was no injury on the part of the victim.

The Defendant did not open the entrance door of the E Center operated by the victim D, and did not destroy or damage the entrance door knife, and did not combine the entrance knife.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 ⑴ 공소사실의 요지 ㈎ 재물손괴 피고인은 2012. 6. 7. 23:10경 부산 북구 C건물 401호에 있는 피해자 D 운영의 E센터에 이르러 피해자 소유인 시가를 알 수 없는 출입문 열쇠 장석고리를 뜯어내어 손괴하였다.

㈏ 업무방해 피고인은 ㈎항 기재 일시, 장소에서 출입문 손잡이를 철사로 묶어 문을 열지 못하게 하여 피해자 D가 출입하지 못하도록 하여 위력으로 피해자의 E센터 운영 업무를 방해하였다.

㈐ 상해 피고인은 2012. 6. 12. 09:47경 부산 북구 C건물 4층 복도에서 피해자 D(여, 50세)와 서로 시비를 하다가 손바닥으로 피해자의 뺨을 2~3회 때리고, 양손으로 피해자의 오른팔을 잡아 비틀어 당기고, 양손으로 피해자를 수회 밀어 위 복도 바닥에 넘어뜨리는 등 하여...