Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CB1100 Oba.

On June 20, 2016, the Defendant driven the upper 00:20 on June 20, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 54.6 km between the breadth of sand village located in the south-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, at a degree of 3-lane of the master’s distance from the shooting distance of the old month, which is small.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving a driver who is engaged in driving service by living well the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected this and did not look at the front side properly, the Defendant violated the pedestrian signal to the right side from the left side of the Defendant on the right side of the Roman, and was driven by the Defendant on the part of the victim C(50 h) (50 h) who passed the crosswalk.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as cutting the body of closed sexual reproduction, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against A or C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A report on investigation (fluor rate);

1. Notification of traffic accident analysis results;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is that the Defendant neglected his/her duty of care in the front direction while driving the Ototoba, thereby causing injury to the victim by shocking the victim walking the crosswalk in the direction of the proceeding, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime, but not the agreement with the victim. However, even though the victim did not agree with the victim, it is deemed that there is no hindrance to the recovery of the damage caused by the harming vehicle being subscribed to liability insurance, and that part of the damage is made for the victim after the closure of pleadings.