logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.16 2016나2029669
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment, except for partial revision as follows.

The three pages 12 of the decision of the first instance court shall be amended to the "Dong Business Agreement" (hereinafter referred to as the "Dong Business Agreement of this case").

Ten pages 4 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be amended " August 31, 2013" to " August 31, 2015."

Presidential Decree No. 26552 of the first instance judgment is amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553 of the Act.

The judgment of the first instance court 6 pages 8 and 10 shall be amended to the judgment of the first instance court “B”.

Part 8 of the first instance court's 8 pages 7, 8, and 9 "each entry in Eul evidence 7, 8, 9, and 12" shall be amended to " Eul's 7, 8, 9, and 12 and the testimony of K witness at the trial."

Paragraph 4 of the first share agreement in the nine pages of the decision of the first instance court is amended to "Paragraph 4 of the first share agreement".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow