A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 1, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Daegu District Court’s Support on the same day, and a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the above court on August 22, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On March 27, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of two or more times due to a drunk driving, and the Defendant was under the influence of 0.096% of blood alcohol level at a modern apartment parking lot located in a permanent residence of 0.096% at the same time and without obtaining a driver’s license on March 27, 2014, driving B-type truck at a distance of about 2 km from the front day of the claim apartment at the same time.

2. On March 27, 2014, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was discovered in front of a claim apartment that is in front of a permanent low-speed apartment, as set forth in paragraph (1), with the background D, etc. belonging to the permanent police station regulating drinking while driving while driving the apartment; (b) was able to have his/her birthed.

The Defendant confirmed the fact of drinking in the measurement through a drinking-free tool, and lost his/her identification card, and the Defendant stated E’s resident registration number as if he/she were his/her resident registration number.

In this respect, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. After measuring the blood alcohol concentration with a drinking measuring instrument at the time and place as stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant forged a copy of the report on the de facto statement of the drinking driver, including the part of the private document under E pertaining to factual verification without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right by stating the “E” in the “E” column of the report on the de facto statement of the drinking driver.

4. The Defendant was aware of the forgery of the written report on the facts of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) as stated in paragraph (2).