logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2017.08.09 2016가단103534
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 5, 2014, Defendant Pyeongtaek-gun announced the public announcement of the tender by setting the total service cost of KRW 1,899,920,00,000, gold conference service cost of KRW 650,00,000, the total service period of KRW 15 months, and 10 months from the commencement date of the service period of the gold association service period of KRW 10,00,00,00,000, and the total service period of KRW 10 months from the commencement date of the service period of the gold association.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Korea Comprehensive Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Comprehensive Technology”), Samsung, Inc., and Chemical Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “New Engineering”), as the representative of the Defendant Korea Comprehensive Technology. The surveying sector in the instant service sector is divided by the Plaintiff, and the engineering sector was awarded the instant service contract by organizing a joint supply and demand organization jointly performing the Defendant Korea Comprehensive Technology, Samyeong, and Chemical Engineering (hereinafter “the instant joint supply and demand organization”), and on August 14, 2014, the service sector entered into the service contract between the Defendant Pyeongtaek-gun and the Defendant Pyeongtaek-gun with regard to KRW 650,00,000 in the instant service cost from August 18, 2014 to June 13, 2015 (the entire service sector of the instant case from August 18, 2014 to June 10, 2015) (hereinafter “the service contract”).

C. On December 2014, Defendant Pyeongtaek Chang-gun became aware that some of the project sections overlap with the “basic river plan (amended) and the “basic river plan (amended) plan for the upstream of the Pyeongtaek River and the river facility preparation service” that was in the process of the instant service and the original regional construction management agency.

Accordingly, in order to prevent double investment in the budget and to efficiently promote business affairs, Defendant Pyeongtaek Chang-gun and the original District Land Management Office entered into a business agreement with the head of the original District Land Management Office, providing Defendant Pyeongtaek-gun with the results of aviation survey, and Defendant Pyeongtaek-gun entered into a basic plan for the entire sections of Hong Chang-gun with the content of establishing the basic plan for the basic plan.

As a result, the Plaintiff among the instant services.

arrow