logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.04.20 2017고단171
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment as a crime of property damage at the Suwon, and was released on October 28, 2016 in Daejeon Prison on the execution of the sentence, and the parole period expired on December 11, 2016.

1. On January 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:05, the 1st floor guards of the C Officetel at C Officetel at C Officetel at C Officetel; (b) the Defendant resisted the Defendant that the said officetel security guards throw away garbage inside the elevator; and (c) the fire extinguishers (metallic materials with a total length of 45 cm and a diameter of 10 cm) which is a dangerous object in front of the above office. In addition, the Defendant destroyed the glass and the glass, etc. that was collected to the end of the cost of the meeting owned by the representative of the victim Ctel occupant of the victim C Office to cover the repair cost of KRW 190,00,000 for repair cost.

2. On January 13, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special public duties and reported to the police by drinking alcohol at the restaurant called “F” located in Sinsi-si E on January 13, 2017.

Ha and I, the police officer belonging to the G District of the Gyeonggi Police Station G District of the Gyeonggi Police Station, who received the subsequent report and called, arrive and Ha cited two beer's disease, which is a dangerous object to the defendant in order to identify the site situation, on the bridge of the above police officer, and the remaining one was on the face of the police officer, and the police officer Ha was on the h.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a ericker who was a dangerous object and obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history, application of outputs of each written judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the acceptance of individuals;

1. Articles 144(1), 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of special duties), 369(1), and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of penalty:

arrow