A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 07:00 on July 4, 2018, the Defendant carried the 208 entrance door owned by the victim E (F) by putting the dangerous things in front of the said officetel 208 at two times to cover the repair cost of 600,000,000, and 302 entrance door of the said officetel owned by the victim C (17cm in length, 300,000 in length, 17cm in blades), which are dangerous things in the Defendant’s house, was dried up to 60,000,000 won of the repair cost of the said officetel owned by the victim, and putting the 300,000,000,000 won of the above officetel attached to the said officetel, and putting about 30 to 40,000 (30,0000 gate) of the wall jointly owned by the owners of the victim C, etc. into the front wall and the 800,000 square.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police in relation to C and G;

1. Protocols of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. A fire-proof report (on-site and CCTV images verification, etc.);

1. Data on CCTV images and photographs taken with a view to committing a crime by a person under his/her control;

1. Written estimate for repair (H);

1. Hearing of statements by a victim G or a witness from the other party to the investigation report;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the CCTV video clocks business;

1. Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of destroying special property and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Protective observation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [one stones (No. 2) seized is brought to the defendant at will before an officetel, and it appears that the owner of the flower belongs to a person other than the defendant and belongs to a person other than the defendant]

1. The basic area (eight months or longer, repeated crimes, special damage, etc.) of types 1 (Habitual, repeated crimes, special damage, etc.) that damage special property of the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria;