Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a current or former worker at C military forest park and forest fire guards.

On December 28, 2017, at around 10:40 on December 28, 2017, the Defendant found the forest park director’s acting E at the CGun Park and the director’s office located in Busan D, and asked that “I would like to test the marine fishery department in the latter part of 2017, I would like to easily call out talks with the person in charge of marine fishery and personnel management so that I would be employed as marine fishery management personnel.” In response, I sent KRW 500,000 in cash to E in the document envelope.

Accordingly, the defendant used his status as a public official to offer a bribe in return for arranging matters belonging to the duties of other public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of suspect interrogation of each police officer regarding E;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A written answer to H;

1. Public announcement of the employment of the Korea Marine Environment Institute, and the application of the C Military Organization Table statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 133 (1) and 132 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to twenty million won; and

2. The sentencing criteria are not applicable as the scope of the recommended punishment is selected according to the sentencing criteria.

3. The criminal act of this case committed by the Defendant on the sentence of sentence is likely to be criticized in that it significantly undermines the general public’s confidence in the outcome of the fair and unfair purchase of duties with respect to the recruitment of public officials.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

The Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime.

There is little difference in the amount of bribe granted by the defendant.

The Defendant received a bribe immediately after the date of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s children were not employed by the C military Manpower Agency of the C military of Korea.

Defendant has long run.