Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 20, 2016, at F around 16:00, the Defendant filed a civil petition on the ground that the Defendant did not use H’s passenger ship in his/her former office, when he/she transported human resources to remove pollutants at sea in the event of a marine pollution caused by oil spill in the G 7th floor, which is the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor of G 16:00, on the ground that the Defendant filed a civil petition on the ground that he/she did not use H’s passenger ship, and that the team leader of the marine environment team, who is a person in charge of the relevant business, explained the reasons why he/she did not use H’s passenger ship, and followed I to the G 8th floor fishery and office.

On January 20, 2016, at around 17:10, the Defendant: (a) demanded that I talk with the fishery company and office of the above G 8th floor of G 8th floor, “I to talk out of the office,” and “I to talk out of the office,” but, if I refused to do so, I would like to write off I’s bat, I would like to remove I’s bat, and I would like to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning general affairs related to the marine environment, such as the treatment of marine pollution sources in the above I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness I, J, K, L, and M;

1. Each police statement concerning I, J, K, and L;

1. The application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to related photographs, G viewing fishery products and organizations;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the crime, the choice of fines (the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the degree of violence, and the relationship of criminal record, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act when considering the background leading to the instant crime, degree of the act, etc.

First, the motive or purpose of the act is to prevent illegality as a legitimate act that does not violate social norms.