logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.05.07 2018가단72143
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 11, 2016, the Plaintiff, including medical treatment, received medical treatment from C Hospital physician D on May 11, 2016, and appealed to the right ht. An Anlelepain (Rt. Anlelepain) for three months, and the diagnosis name of the Plaintiff is “the left-hand-hand side of the part of the damage and the loss satisfaction, and the part-hand side of the complete hack.”

The Plaintiff, according to the diagnosis from July 7, 2016 to August 13, 2016, performed a surgery for the operation of the operation from D, but did not completely state the part of the operation.

Accordingly, on September 12, 2016, the Plaintiff transferred to E Hospital to which the Defendant belongs.

B. As to the E hospital to which the Defendant belongs, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the E hospital from September 12, 2016 to September 22, 2016, and received treatment from the Defendant. From October 24, 2016 to November 10, 2016, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the hospital and received treatment from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant treatment”).

At the time of the transfer to E Hospital, the Plaintiff was in the state of being in the upper part of the surgery.

On September 13, 2016, the Plaintiff received dypical dypology and fypology from the Defendant, and the surgery department did not completely recover from the Defendant. On October 25, 2016, the Plaintiff received dypical dypical dypology and dypical dypology.

After that, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the Defendant until November 10, 2016, but did not completely recover from the Defendant.

C. On November 10, 2016, the Plaintiff, including the power generation and treatment, was transferred to the F Hospital to the F Hospital, and was treated by the F Hospital until December 21 of the same year.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 2 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff received the instant medical treatment from the Defendant from September 12, 2016 to November 10, 2016, and conducted two times, but did not completely recover from the department of the surgery, and the Plaintiff’s specific opinion is presented from the Defendant before the said surgery.

arrow