Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor at the Seoul Southern District Court for the crime of interference with business, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2016.

On August 29, 2015, the Defendant called the “Dasan Center” No. 120 times operated by the Seoul Special Metropolitan City at a scopic place on August 15:54, 2015, and asked the counselor B (hereinafter referred to as “Scopic bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch xch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch xch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with another person, organization, or person performing official duties due to unexpected difficulties, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each statement of B, C, D, E, F, G, and H;

1. Records, results of each recording, and of communication data meetings;

1. Sound CDs;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 3 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and the selection of fines for the crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;