logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.22 2017나21175
가등기의 말소등기절차의 이행청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Even if the allegations by the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are closely examined, it does not seem that there was any error in the findings and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

No. 47 of the 5th judgment of the first instance court shall be applied with "No. 47, 48, 57, and 60".

The 5th page 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "only a partial testimony of witness G" in the 5th page 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "only a witness G of the court of first instance, and a witness C of the

No. 17 to 18 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written with "No. 25" in the form of "No. 28."

The 5th page 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the "Witness G" of the court of first instance as " witness G of the court of first instance."

On August 16, 2016, 2016, the first instance court's 6th 3 pages "the fact that the registration of ownership transfer has been completed on August 16, 201."

2. If so, the conclusion of the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow