logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.28 2016가단5013478
소유권보존등기 등 말소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 파주군(坡州郡) Q 대 0.06정보에 관하여 일제 강점기에 작성된 임야조사서에 사정명의인으로 고양군(高陽郡) R에 주소를 둔 S이 기재되어 있다.

나. 고양군(高陽郡) T에 본적을 둔 U은 V 출생하고 1943. 12. 5. 사망하였는데 원고들은 그 후손들이다.

C. As to the 298㎡ (hereinafter “instant land”), the Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of ownership transfer as the Do Government District Court’s Goyang-dong Branch’s Dayang-dong Branch’s 514 on January 14, 1981, and the Defendant N completed the registration of ownership transfer as the 31150 on November 16, 1990 by the same registry office.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 5 through 9 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. 원고들의 주장 이 사건 토지는 파주군(坡州郡) Q 대 0.06정보에서 분할된 토지이고, 사정명의인인 S은 원고들의 선조인 고양군(高陽郡) T에 본적을 둔 U과 동일인이다.

Since U’s heir is the act of preserving each co-owner, the Plaintiffs, as co-owner, seek each procedure for cancellation of registration stated in the purport of the claim against the Defendants, as it is the act of preserving each co-owner, unless the registered titleholder fails to assert or prove the fact of acquisition by succession.

3. In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings and arguments as to the statements or videos set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 3, 4, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 8, defendant N entered into a contract to purchase at KRW 3,880,000 from the defendant who is the title holder of the land of this case on December 27, 1989, and since the registration of ownership transfer was completed on November 16, 1990, it can be recognized that he occupied by cultivating crops or building up and owning buildings until now.

arrow