Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the actual business owner of the building of Gangnam-si C and the 3th floor D Game site. Defendant A is the so-called “bab president,” who had lent the name of the above game site and prepared for the police control, etc., to go to the above game site from time to time and decided to run a job for Defendant B instead of Defendant B.

No one shall provide game products with the contents different from those of the game products rated.

Nevertheless, the Defendants also operated the said game room from January 23, 2019 to January 29, 2019, and sought the form of 5,000 points to the users when appearing on the background screen of the Africa, which was rated as follows: “The screen does not have any relation with the use or outcome of the game.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer an unspecified number of customers with game products different from the rated game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. [Investigation Report (Attachment to African International Game Manual) - Game Manual), Investigation Report (Consolidated Examples), and [Investigation Report (On-the-spot conditions and video CDs) - On-the-spot photographs, video photographings, lease photographs]

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Probation and community service order Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants: Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act;