logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단3135
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On December 9, 2016, A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution at the Seoul Central District Court, and that judgment became final and conclusive on March 9, 2017, and Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on May 12, 2016 and two years of suspended execution, and that judgment became final and conclusive on March 9, 2017.

The Defendants are in a separate relationship between Defendant B and C D Vice-Chairperson, and as they had been willing to actively cooperate in the Defendants’ projects in C Group, the Defendants conspired to deceiving the victims E to acquire the investment money.

Defendant

A around September 2012, at the victim's office located in the F Building G in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building G, the victim told the victim that "the vice president of the CD prior to one month was only in his office," and that D vice presidents want to support B in an economically difficult situation and care together.

In addition, the D Vice-Chairperson made a false statement to the effect that the B would actively cooperate with the C Group if he/she assistance in establishing the primary cooperative of H-related C, and that he/she would give the A a letter to the effect that he/she would act as an executive officer of the C Group if he/she success, and that Defendant B would act as an executive officer of the C Group. Defendant B would act as the victim in the presence of Defendant A and K in the Songpa-gu Seoul J hotel coffee shop around October 2012.

However, in fact, Defendant B did not have a separate relationship with C Group C Group A, and there was no fact that the Defendants did not directly talk with D Vice-Chairperson on investment, and there was no fact that C Group promised to cooperate in the Defendant’s automobile-related detention delivery business.

Nevertheless, on October 31, 2012, the Defendants were 51 million won, N’s account, 20 million won, and O’s account from the injured party.

arrow