logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.09.17 2020고정552
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2019, the Defendant: (a) was a person who announced the case at the “E” event held by Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D”; and (b) was given information from the victim and the said group upon the victim’s request to establish the “E” group through the Internet Pest North Korea after participating in the said event; and (c) made the victim’s request to change the role of the manager.

On October 2019, the Defendant forced the victim who was the manager and forced the victim to leave the above group. Around 600 members, the Defendant changed the name of the above group to F, on the ground that he had written comments about the contents irrelevant to the quality of A at the early police station of the above group.

Around October 13, 2019, the Defendant, even though there was no fact that the victim retired from the above E, and there was no other fact that he wanted to have contributed to the donation, the Defendant posted a statement on the following: (a) around October 13, 2019: (b) around the Defendant’s residence located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, stating that the victim, who was a manager forced to leave the above Face North “F Group” group room using a mobile phone, refers to “X manager”; and (c) “E intends to make a statement on the reasons why E has changed the name to F at this time. E is operated as a donation as NGO. E. Nevertheless, X manager was forced to leave from the E, and then invested money, and sought to have contributed, such as E design expenses, performance expenses, newspaper expenses, and transaction expenses, etc. with newspaper companies.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant’s written statement concerning the Defendant’s partial statement B, two closures of the Defendant’s accusation, two closures of the Defendant’s accusation, and the name of the complainants, and the Defendant’s accusation 15 pages for the closure of the instant communications, including the group members and comments, and 74 statutes apply to the closures of the E Pssen group managers’ instant communications, including comments.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the information and communications network of choice of punishment;

arrow