logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.05.11 2017고단2594
자동차관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a motor vehicle industrial company in the name of “D Motor Vehicle Maintenance” in the previous YY City, and was reported as a person who inspected the performance of a motor vehicle from the net market on January 6, 2012.

No inspector of the performance status of a motor vehicle shall inspect or notify falsely the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant attempted to falsely check the performance status of the structure and devices of a motor vehicle by making a false inspection by making a false inspection of the performance status of a motor vehicle by visiting the motor vehicle registration certificate or receiving it by facsimile and making it difficult to check a large number of vehicles in a short period on the grounds that the distance between the sales company of each used vehicle and the manufacturer of D Motor Vehicle operated by the Defendant is far from each used vehicle to D Motor Vehicle Industrial Complex operated by the Defendant for the purpose of automobile inspection, and that the time and expenses are required to move the motor vehicle to D Motor Vehicle Industrial Complex operated by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant, on January 2, 2017, conducted a false inspection of the performance status of the structure and devices of the automobile by arbitrarily stating the status of 34 items, such as motor, transmission of power, steering and brakes, electricity, etc., by using a motor vehicle registration certificate issued by a middle class motor vehicle dealer belonging to the G Motor Vehicle Sales Company, even though H vehicles owned by F, which are the representative of F, do not actually enter into the said maintenance business, and by arbitrarily indicating the status of 34 items, such as motor, transmission of power, steering and brakes, electricity, etc.

In addition, the defendant is attached from January 2, 2017 to March 3, 2017.

arrow