Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the director of “D”, a planning real estate located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C.

At around 09:40 on March 29, 2012, the Defendant changed the list of 10 years from the F University graduate her example to the Defendant, and the Defendant entered into a “in-house agreement,” she did not go back to the patrial of the patrial. If the patrial of the patrial of the patrial, the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial and the patrial of the patrial of the patrial of the patrial.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. Claimant: Self-defense;

2. Determination: In light of the method of the instant crime and the specific circumstances at the time of the instant crime, it is difficult to view that the Defendant only passive defense against an unjust attack, and that the Defendant committed an active harmful act as an intent to attack. Therefore, the allegation of self-defense is rejected.