logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고단2814
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, by imprisonment for a year, and by imprisonment for a year, and imprisonment with prison labor for a period of six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and the Defendants jointly committed a game game room in the Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon from March 29, 2016 to April 7, 2017:30, Defendant A had registered as a juvenile game providing business entity, and Defendant A had installed 70 game machine of “Seshore” with the entire users, and had arbitrarily altered the contents of the rating to give points, such as 50,000 points, 10,000 points, and 300,000 points to unspecified customers. Defendant B recruited customers as “management department” and managed the overall operation of the game room, such as employees exchange and management.

In addition, Defendant B, after using the above game machine, exchanged the remaining points after deducting 10% of the following fees, an unspecified customer, who opened a game machine and classified the inside of the machine in order to make a settlement point.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the grade contents and exchanged the result of tangible or intangible type obtained thereby.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of Defendant A around May 20, 2016 to May 23, 2010: (a) from around 20, to around 00:10 to around 20, 200:10, in the J Gameland game site on the first floor of Seo-gu I, Daejeon, the Defendant registered with the competent authority as a juvenile game providing business operator, and exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% of commission from the points that the customers acquired through the game, by covering the “sea-to-sea-to-sea” game for the “sea-to-sea” game for the entire users.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified for use, and carried out speculative business by exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained thereby.

3. Defendant C and D’s criminal act from April 3, 2016, and Defendant D from April 4, 2016.

arrow