logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.25 2014나48377
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the pertinent part of the reasoning of the judgment, and thus, citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

In case of actual income: 130,969,622 won: Personal information 1) : The term of income and operation is as stated in the “basic matters” in the annexed amount of damages calculation sheet. 2) The defendant, until he reaches the age of 60, the urban daily wage (22 day of the same month) and the 1,572,100 won per month, which is less than the urban daily wage at the time of the accident, had been employed as a F kindergarten teacher at the time of the accident. Thus, it is argued that the actual income at the time of the accident should be calculated on the basis of the above income, which is the actual income at the time of the accident. Thus, it is probable that the worker should work in the workplace even if he is employed in the workplace, if there is a higher general wage than the income that he had earned at his own workplace, barring any special circumstance, if the ordinary wage at the time of the closing of argument is calculated on the basis of such wage, and it shall be proved by the Supreme Court en banc Decision 98Da19696999.

arrow