The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and the accident of this case occurred in competition with the driver's negligence in driving signal violation of the victim C, the vehicle of this case is affiliated with the National Federation of Bus Transport Business Association, and the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind as the crime of this case.

However, the crime of this case is committed in violation of the duty to observe the signal at the intersection where the Defendant, a bus driver, was in violation of the duty to observe the signal signal, and conflict with the victim C Driving Vehicle, and the above damaged vehicle caused injury to the victim C, H, E, and G by shocking other damaged vehicles for three weeks. In light of the circumstances and degree of injury of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is not less severe in light of the circumstances and degree of injury, and the victim C was punished with a fine of 1,50,000 won less than the Defendant in relation to the accident of this case, but it seems that the circumstance of the victim of this case was considered as the victim C’s wife, but it is reasonable to comprehensively consider the defendant’s age, character, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and the records of the crime, etc., and the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.