The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (5 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects on the fact that the vehicle of this case was affiliated with the Federation of the Passenger Transport Business Association. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant, who is a taxi driver, in violation of the duty to observe the signal signal at the intersection where signal, etc. is installed, and caused the victim D to suffer injury requiring 2 weeks, victim F and H, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks of medical treatment, and the victim I. In light of the circumstance and degree of injury, the crime is not easy in light of the degree of injury. The defendant was punished for the same crime of this case even around 2012, and there were other records that the defendant was punished for the same crime of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and result, after the crime, the circumstances after the crime of this case, and the records of the crime, etc., the judgment of the court below is too undue and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.