logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.12 2016고단6398 (1)
위계공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B, upon introduction of C, the defendant who failed to pass the driver's license examination several times, was requested to apply for the driver's license examination on behalf of the defendant, and conspired to receive the consideration.

On May 19, 2016, at around 10:00, the Defendant issued to C and B an application sheet for the driver's license test and a written confirmation of loss report of the Defendant's resident registration certificate, and around 09:36 on May 20, 201, B and the North Korean license examination site prior to the Road Traffic Authority, which was held in 359, in order to purchase the Defendant's license test sheet and written confirmation of loss report of the Plaintiff's resident registration certificate, the Defendant removed the Defendant's photograph from the Defendant's application sheet for the driver's license test and written confirmation of loss report of the Plaintiff's resident registration certificate, attached the Defendant's photograph to the examiner, and submitted B's identification photograph and written confirmation of loss report of the Plaintiff's driver's license test, and received the applicant for the driver's license test and the applicant for passing the driver's license test.

B was delivered to the Defendant 1,200,000 won as agent fee, and C was issued from the Defendant 3,00,000 won as agent fee for the vehicle driver's license test that received the above successful rubber.

Accordingly, in collusion with B and C, the Defendant interfered with the execution of duties related to the driver's license test management of the North Korean License Testing Laboratory prior to the Road Traffic Authority, which is deemed a public official by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

B, each protocol of interrogation of suspect B against C

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant, B, and C of each police interrogation report (Attachment to a suspect A's application list), one copy of the suspect A's application list to the defendant, and one copy of the suspect A's application list (request for data, such as the frequency of application), the request for business cooperation, the request for business cooperation, the request for reissuance of resident registration certificates, the

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

arrow