A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:00 on October 5, 2015, the Defendant driven an EF rocketing car at approximately 15km from the front side of the D main parking lot located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, from around 02:45 on the same day to the 3rd side of the Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, Seoul, the operation of the 2nd highway, which is located in the 465-5 operation Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Incheon.

2. On the same day as Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant was required to take a alcohol test on the ground that, prior to the exit of the above EF rocketing car at around 02:50 on the same day, the Defendant was in demand for a alcohol test on the ground that the Defendant sprinked the Defendant’s entrance at the seat of the expressway patrol team pursuant to the background F (38 years old) belonging to the Incheon Regional Police Agency Police Agency, and a slope G (37 years old), f (38 years old), f (37 years old) sprinking, etc., who stopped the above EF rocketing car and opened the window while

The Defendant said G that “I would be punished for drinking alcohol according to the law,” and refused to take a measurement, and caused the Defendant to tear to the right-hand part of the external service boom, which he wear, by sculing the breath of the instant G, by sculing the breath. The said F refused to breathly breath of the F in his body after he prevented the Defendant, and attempted to breathly breath of the F in his body by her hand after having sculged the body, and blaged the F in his body with his hand after having breathed the body, who was dispatched to the Defendant upon receiving a request for breath support, and the Defendant breathed “I do not have to do so” and breadddd and breaddddd and bladdd and h’s body upon his drinking driving circumstances.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to G, H and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry into the results of the drinking driving control;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and