1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 14, 2005, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Skistan”), and the status of employment for training (E-8) was deleted on June 1, 2007 by the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act amended by Presidential Decree No. 20076, Jun. 1, 2007;

On August 18, 2011, when the status of stay for non-professional employment (E-9) changes into the status of stay and stays in the Republic of Korea, applied for the recognition of refugee to the defendant.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On March 20, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on December 23, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a hydrospathic unit from the Swinbace (NWP, North) of the Northwest of Pakistan (NWP, North). The Plaintiff’s assertion is a hydrospathic unit.

At the time of visiting Pakistan from October 4, 2010 to November 7, 2010, the Plaintiff demanded 25,000 U.S. dollars to use the phone phone phone phone phone phone phone phone phone from type B. However, the Plaintiff refused to use the phone because there was no money owned by the Plaintiff.

After that, the plaintiff was shocked by two members of the armed rioted with Austria when he was in the same manner as Ma-gu, 15:00 on October 20, 2010, and the above leader was demanded to change USD 25,000 to the plaintiff.