logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.08.21 2014구합8599
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 12, 2005, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 12, 2005 and the said status of stay for training employment (E-8) was deleted on June 1, 2007 by Presidential Decree No. 20076;

On July 7, 2008, when staying in the status of non-professional employment (E-9), the applicant re-enters the Republic of Korea with the status of non-professional employment (E-9) on August 14, 2008, and filed an application for refugee recognition with the Defendant on August 11, 201, two days before the expiration of the period of stay.

(hereinafter “instant refugee application”). B.

On May 24, 2013, the defendant rejected the refugee application of this case on the ground that the plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the plaintiff would suffer persecution" as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

(See Evidence No. 1-1, hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

On July 1, 2013, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the instant disposition to the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed it on April 11, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1-2, Eul evidence 1-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the hydropathal forest from Pakistan punjab. The Plaintiff is the hydropathal forest.

The father B purchased farmland 13, around 1990 and purchased 4, one of them in the name of the plaintiff.

Around 2002, the Plaintiff’s Sam Village C demanded the ownership of the said farmland to transfer it to himself, threatening B and the Plaintiff’s family members, and the remaining 9 E-W had also changed to the Plaintiff’s name.

On August 3, 2008, the Plaintiff visited Pakistan on a locking-up basis, and takes a place with Australia.

arrow