Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:00 on May 5, 2012, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim’s “F house in Ansan-si,” saying, “I, and J listen to the h, F, I, and J’s desire to “this son, f, f, and f, f, f,” from the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Examination protocol of the suspect of G by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F, I, and J;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the facts acknowledged by the records of this case, the Defendant alleged that there was no her hummatics against the victim. However, the Defendant consistently testified that the victim took a hummatics from the Defendant, F, I, and J of this case consistently stated that the Defendant took a hummatics against the victim, and the process of and following the process of the occurrence of the hums between the Defendant and the H victim, the Defendant merely stated that the victim “I humping the state-owned land humping?” The Defendant only stated that “I humping the State-owned land humping?? I humping the Defendant’s humsing and assault the victim, and then the victim took a hump and humping back the victim, and that the Defendant was not able to take into account the Defendant’s hummatic efforts that caused the humsys from the victim.