The part against the plaintiff falling under the order of additional payment among the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when the judgment is used or added as follows.

2. Following the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the impact on the Plaintiff’s married life” during the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance: “The case in which and D claims compensation for damages due to the same unlawful act as in the instant case against C, the Plaintiff’s wife,” adding “the fact that the judgment was rendered and the judgment became final and conclusive as it is (25 million won)” to D, and the last action “17 million won” to “25 million won.”

The fourth written judgment of the court of first instance is not more than Ra.

The part of the port shall be dried as follows:

D. The Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from February 28, 2019 to September 20, 2019, the date following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, which is the day of the judgment of the first instance, to September 20, 2019, and 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from the next day to the day of full payment, to the day of full payment, with respect to damages for delay of eight million won, which is the part ordering additional payment by this court, from February 28, 2019 to the day of full payment. The Defendant is liable to pay damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from the day following the judgment of the first instance to August 19, 202, which is a considerable judgment of the first instance, to the day of full payment.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is above.