logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(춘천) 2017.11.29 2017나525
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' incidental appeal and the defendants' appeal are all dismissed.

2. The expansion of the purport of the claim by this court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the judgment of this court citing the allegations added or emphasized by the Defendants is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment of this court is added to the allegations added or emphasized by the Defendants. As such, it is citing

2. Parts to be dried;

A. From 10th to 6th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e.g., “12,742,354.”

B. The remaining amount after the deduction of 13th to 8th day of the first instance judgment: 34,205,426 won (=4,82,354 won for future treatment costs of KRW 23,580,473 - KRW 7,000) shall be limited to 23,580,473 - 7,000 won for future treatment costs of KRW 250 per annum from the 25th day of the first instance judgment to the 14th day of the 14th day of the 5th day of the 20th day of the 15th day of the 20th day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 1st day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 1st day of the 2nd day of the 3th day of the 1st day of the 2nd day of the 1st day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 3th day of the 1st day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 3th day of the 15th day.

The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff B and C each of KRW 4,00,000, Plaintiff D’s KRW 2,000,000, and each of the said money, on March 7, 2014, the date of tort.

arrow