beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant and the victim C (the 39 years of age) are married around October 2002 and there is a difference between the parties to the agreement around September 3, 201.
1. Around May 201, the Defendant, within the Defendant’s vehicle located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council, completed the work and returned to the house, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts to the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information, even though the victim left the vehicle from March 201 to March 201 due to the problem of the nature of the difference of the victim, although the victim was not having a male problem or having a wind with another male and female.
2. On May 201, the Defendant: (a) around March 201, 201, the fact that the Defendant was at the “E branch” was a matter of the victim’s nature difference; (b) from March 201, the victim was released from the Defendant; and (c) even though there was no fact that he was sent out due to a male problem, the Defendant was sealed by the said F that he was obscene while going back. The Defendant asked for divorce. The Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.”
3. On June 201, the Defendant: (a) at the H’s house, a person related to the foregoing church located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “I would have come home despite the fact that the victim did not have any other male or female interested; (b) I would have been in a relationship with I weather. Nevertheless, even if I want to go back, I would have been able to go back. I would have experienced in the same way as I.B.; (c) I would not have any understanding; and (d) I would have given I would have come to the money paid for the child support.”
4. On June 201, the Defendant: (a) notwithstanding the fact that the victim does not have any other male and any interested person, the Defendant is a Handphone of the Defendant.