1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates the Sungpo University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. Around September 30, 2009, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as an SSC (Esalous Choriorthinopy, central beer scophy, and so on as a result of multiple tests conducted by the medical staff, including the dental doctor and professor B, at the Defendant Hospital. The Plaintiff visited the Defendant hospital at the intervals of one month and provided outpatient medical treatment, but the symptoms did not change.

C. The defendant as of April 19, 2010 for the reduction of the Plaintiff’s net studio and the defense of vision.

6.1. On two occasions, the procedure was conducted on April 19, 2010, to injecting Abotine in the Free Zone of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the first Abotine injecting”) and on June 1, 2010, to “the second Abotine injecting,” and the two were combined to “each of the instant Abotine injecting.”

The Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital, selected the Defendant Hospital’s internal doctor and professor B as the doctor and the doctor in charge of the procedure. On the premise of this, the Defendant Hospital added KRW 73,810,700 to KRW 70,00 as selective medical expenses in calculating the medical expenses for each of the of the of the of the of the of the instant Abane drugs, but in fact, the doctor who performed the above procedure was a four-year doctor in charge of the inside and major of the Defendant Hospital.

E. After receiving each of the instant Absin injection, the Plaintiff came to a state of LP (LP) to the extent that the Plaintiff could only recognize that the Plaintiff had no light due to the occurrence of an information infection on the left.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 5-1, 2-2 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff selected B, who is both the doctor and professor of the Defendant hospital, as the Plaintiff’s medical doctor in receiving each of the instant Abane injection. As such, the Defendant hospital allowed B to injecting each of the instant Abane as prescribed by the Medical Service Act and the elective Medical Rules.