The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was diagnosed with urology in 2007 for a period of ten years, and was treated with two types accompanied by neological mergers in C medical clinics.

B. On January 26, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the department within the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) and was diagnosed by the diversology (PDR) and the towing net diversology in both sides.

C. The Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital, was implementing the first anti-operopic (PRP) with respect to the coordinates on the day on which the Plaintiff was located at the Defendant Hospital, and the second anti-operopic (PRP) with respect to January 29, 2017 respectively.

On January 31, 2017, the Plaintiff took charge of the spPV as well as the modified spPV with respect to the spPV towing net spoppy at the Defendant Hospital.

E. The Plaintiff, at the Defendant Hospital on February 15, 2017, was respectively subject to the first pandecopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic typopic s

F. On February 16, 2017, the Plaintiff was implementing an injecting dex dex in a glass dex with respect to the sulfur half of the Coordinate Department.

G. On April 6, 2017, the Plaintiff received one month’s instruction and explanation to return back to the Defendant Hospital to observe the continuous network condition.

H. On August 30, 2017, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital for approximately five months, and on August 30, 2017, the Nauri-si was observed by the safety balance of 40cm, dynamic pressure of 22-26mHg, and dynamics loss.

The plaintiff proposed to wear contact lensess for treatment in the unit and occupy antibiotics (Cravit), and re-see it after one week.

(i) On September 7, 2017, at the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with 34-37mHg of the Coordinate pressure, each upper part of the body, and each part of the body, with the blood transfusion in the front bank, red bonds, and with the observation of the scarcity, and was diagnosed with the NVG’s identification card, and with the identification card of the savG’s identification card.

The plaintiff was prescribed by the internal pressure on the day of internal origin, the climatic drugs, the antibiotical agents, and the climatic agents.

(j) On September 23, 2017, the Plaintiff raised the Coordinate at Defendant Hospital.