A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 3556"

1. The Defendant was working as a representative licensed real estate agent of “D Real Estate” located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu.

On July 3, 2009, in order to apply for a real estate collateral loan for houses E 301 in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from the above "D Real Estate Office" office, the Defendant created a form of "the details of move-in household perusal" by using a computer, and then created the "the details of move-in household perusal" by using the computer: 09:42, July 3, 2010; the address of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

E. 301, stating “301,” the name of the householder and the date of transfer, and the resident status column, forged a copy of “the details of the move-in household perusal” document in the name of the office of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising “the head of the relevant address does not exist.”

At that time, the Defendant continued to use the forged official document by facsimile as if the “the details of the transfer household perusal”, which was forged, was a genuine document, to the G Judicial scrivener on behalf of the Defendant, located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City 385-19, Nam-gu, Incheon.

In addition, from around that time to March 18, 2010, the Defendant: (a) forged a total of 26 public documents, which are official documents, to obtain real estate mortgage loans from the eropic Cooperatives, as indicated in the attached Table (1) in order to obtain real estate mortgage loans; and (b) sent them to the eropic Cooperatives by facsimile and exercised them respectively.

2. On October 7, 2009, the Defendant filed an application for a housing mortgage loan of 102 houses of the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I building 102, which he acquired in his name from the office of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Cooperatives, the victim under the name of 385-19 on October 7, 2009. The Defendant falsely prepared “the details of transfer household perusal” as stated in the preceding paragraph, as if the former tenant actually resided in the said house but he did not have the relocated householder.