1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. During the process of the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit for refugee status (C-3) on August 25, 2013, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) of the date of application for refugee status recognition (C-3) on May 23, 2016, the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”): The fact that there is no dispute that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on February 24, 2017 of the date of application for objection, as of October 6, 2016, that there is no ground for rejection of the decision made on February 24, 2017, as of the date of application for objection, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).

The plaintiff has entered the slovaististist female in Pakistan to the slovasistian to the slovasistian, and thereby, the plaintiff was threatened by the above women's family members.

In addition, the plaintiff's homicide is used as a murder and there is a reduction in the house.

As such, the Plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan is likely to also threaten.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is a state of nationality unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding the whole arguments to the evidence as stated in the evidence No. 4-1 to No. 4 and No. 5 of the evidence No. 4-1 to the whole purport of the pleading, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff has “a well-founded fear of being injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.”