Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, and Defendant C by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and C are married couple, and the defendant A is known in the defendant B, C and Dong N and within the branch.

1. Defendant B and Defendant B around 23:00 on June 3, 2012, around 23:0, on the front side of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, the victim A (the victim 31 years of age, the female) spreaded the drinking house to himself/herself, and spreads the face of the tap water that he/she had been drinking, and the victim A’s spaced, spawned, spawned, and breed.

Defendant

C was contacted by Defendant B, and arrived at the above place, the victim A's knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

As a result, the Defendants put up various types of gamblings, safafafafafafa, etc. to the victims for three weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A argued with the victim B (age 38, female) on the grounds stated in paragraph (1) at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph (1). Defendant A saw the victim B’s her head lives, added her head lives, her head lives, and her head lives to the victim B for three weeks, and her head lives, etc., and her head lives that the victim C (age 38 and South) must be her head lives, and her head lives into her head lives, and her head lives, and her head lives that the victim C (age

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant B and C

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant B and C: Articles 257(1), 263, and 30 of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Defendant A asserts to the effect that his act constitutes a legitimate act or self-defense as a passive resistance against the victim’s assault, respectively, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

However, as seen earlier.