Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 01:30 on July 2, 2013, Defendant A told the victim G (the age of 49) who is a substitute driver to “a person to the Haan Police Station,” and reported that the said victim was in a short range when guiding and searching a mobile phone with the mobile phone, Defendant A expressed a desire to “twel, twel, swel, and down”.
Accordingly, the Defendant, on the ground of the victim’s resistance, caused the victim to be able to take a bath, when he was unable to take a bath, set at one time the victim’s scam part of the victim’s scam at one time, and one time the victim’s scams.
As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as inner stoves, stoves, and stoves that require treatment for a period of 14 days.
2. Defendants A were arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of bodily injury from the victim I (the age of 49) belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station H District of the Busan Southern Police Station and the Gyeong J (the age of 36) who was dispatched to the scene after receiving the report of 112 of the above G at the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, and were arrested by the above police officers in the course of carrying out patrols by the above police officers, saying, “I would bring a swimming pool, Irb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k on the ground by pushing the aboveJ over the ground, and the Defendant B who was
Accordingly, when Defendant B was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties from the above police officers, Defendant B made it difficult to take a cell phone image with the cell phone, and attach clothes of police officers.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit violence against the victims to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time the Defendant A tried to inspect the inside and outside of the treatment days to the above victim J and the left hand.
3. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties is around 02:12 on the same day as paragraph (1).