A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives the C&L car owned by the wife B.

1. On August 6, 2016, the defendant of the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the defendant of the violation (driving without a license) shall be required from the front of the Daegu-gu Northbuk-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the road of the apartment around 08:5

From about 3 km to the front road of the gold station, the vehicle was driven without obtaining a driver's license in the state of being drunk with blood alcohol concentration of about 0.075%.

2. The Defendant discovered a police officer to commit an act referred to in paragraph (1) and committed an act of forging private documents and uttering of a falsified investigation document in order to encourage the detection of unauthorized Driving.

Defendant on August 6, 2016, 08:50 around 08:50, North Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, the summary of the change in North Daegu-gu.

With the aim of exercising the right on the road in front of the Gu office, G presented by G, without authority, to state “E” in the driver’s name column of the report on the statement of the state office of the State office, stating “I, as a person subject to the revocation of license, confirm that the above entry was the same as the fact, and, in case of unjust recognition, I sign the report on the result, I do not want it.” and then submit E’s signature to G.

As a result, the Defendant forged the part of the driver’s name among the report on the statement on the state of state-owned driver, which is a private document regarding the fact-finding, and submitted it to the police officer G who is aware of the fact that the report was genuine.

3. When the Defendant was found to have committed an act under Paragraph 1 at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, the Defendant was found to have committed an act under Paragraph 2, the Defendant entered the circumstances, which are police officers in charge of drinking driving control, into the drinking driving control report, and then electronically signed “E” in the PDA presented for the signature of the driver, and is within the electronic traffic information network, which is an electronic record of a certificate of fact.