beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From January 2, 2008 to May 31, 2012, from February 4, 2013 to November 20, 2013, the Defendant signed a comprehensive business management service contract with Q and R, the owner of which, on June 7, 2007, entered into a contract with a limited company (P; hereinafter referred to as "P") located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of performing the "comprehensive business management services" for S projects on January 8, 2007, T, U.S. companies, and Korea companies, Korea companies, were incorporated with a large of five companies, such as U.S. companies, V, W, and X, with an order to establish the S business plan to perform construction works from the date of signing the contract, construction supervision, construction supervision, etc., as a whole, and Q and Q.
During the process of performing the former UN, P was in charge of performing the work of examining and managing the design of the electricity design firm in relation to the construction work among the overall construction management of the SP project entrusted by Q (hereinafter “ Q”) and R (hereinafter “R”) and the overall construction management, and finally supporting Q and R’s electrical design approval procedure.
Around October 2009, the Defendant would have 10 to 20% of the price for electrical design services related to the construction of S business from the Electric Designer B, an electrical designer, at the Defendant’s store located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seoul. In the future, the Defendant received a request from the Electric Designer B to the help to receive a subcontract for the electrical design services related to the construction of S business and received a request from the former bank account of the Defendant from November 13, 2009 to October 14, 2013 as shown in the list of crimes in the annexed crime.
As a result, the defendant acquired property in return for an illegal solicitation as to his duties as a person who administers another's business.
2. Defendant B. The Defendant