logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.22 2017고단2702
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A staff member of telecommunications fraud fraud in the name of a person who calls to many unspecified persons in China as if they were investigation agencies, let them withdraw money by deceiving the victim and deliver it to the defendant. The defendant conspireds to deceiving the victim by deceiving the victim by receiving the money from the victim who was a staff member of the Financial Supervisory Service, while doing the act as if he was the said employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.

1. On February 15, 2017, at around 10:37, 2017, a staff member in charge of telecommunications fraud in the name of the crime committed against the victim C makes a false statement to the effect that “D investigator is a DNA investigator, who was used and reported as a passbook to the party head, and was subject to the investigation, and all the money in Seoul and the head of the passbook are found to be in cash, and thus, he/she shall withdraw KRW 9,00,000 to the victim and withdraw KRW 9,000 to the Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

The entrance area 4 times in the future, and the defendant was ordered to receive money from the damage victim through the Messenger from the above name in the name of the defendant, and the above accommodation around 16:30 on the same day.

Before the withdrawal of entrance area 4, the fact was committed as if the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service was not an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and received the above KRW 9,000,000 from the injured party, and remitted the above money to the person who was not a member of the Financial Supervisory Service.

2. On February 15, 2017, in China, around 12:37, 2017, a staff member in charge of telecommunications fraud in the name of the crime committed against the victim E, and even if not, the fact is phoneed to the victim E and phoneed to the victim E, “F is the Seoul Central District Prosecutor,” and it is necessary to confirm whether the money contained in the passbook was illegal.

arrow