logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단2492
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 through 7 shall be confiscated from Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2492] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of aiding and abetting a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Central District Court on April 1, 2015 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for April 9, 2015, and the same type of criminal records is more than three times.

[Criminal facts] Defendant A operates a game hall with the trade name of the F Gameland on the third floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and Defendant B and G are employees of the above game hall.

No one shall distribute or provide a game product, the rating of which has been refused because it falls under the game products, or exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange, or repurchase a tangible or intangible result obtained through the use of a game product.

Nevertheless, from March 4, 2017 to March 8, 2017, the Defendants, unlike “WAER-B”, which is a game product classified by the Game Water Management Committee as a rating from March 4, 2017, opened when a game starts by converting the cash into the point, and four points are indicated on the screen of the game machine. The 100 points deduction was made once prior to one time, and three or four of the four of the four of the four of the four of the games, the Defendants added a function to obtain points from 10 to 500 points, and installed a yellow game that is, the rating of which is refused by the Game Water Management Committee, to provide the remaining customers with the amount of 48 points that have been acquired through the said game by deducting the fee for the said games. In addition, the Defendants provided 10% of the total amount of the games to unspecified customers by using the game machine.

As a result, the Defendants provided game water jointly for use and exchanged intangible results obtained through the use of the game.

arrow