A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who operates a mutual infinite-gu building B and a mutual infinite game room on the second floor.

1. No person who violates the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide game water, the rating of which is denied by the Game Water Management Committee because it falls under speculative game water, and exchange, arrange for exchange, or re-purchase of such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water shall be prohibited;

Nevertheless, from July 26, 2018 to August 6, 2018, the Defendant established 13 games in the said mutual influenite game, and one-third of the 'C' games of which rating is refused by the Game Water Management Committee, and provided them to the unspecified number of customers who find the above game site, and if the number or picture is arranged with the same number or picture as the front line, the customers return to the front line, and if they return to the front line, they obtain the corresponding game machine, and if the said customers request the exchange, the said customers obtained the corresponding game machine, and if they request the exchange, the said customers made 10% limit of the fee by converting the total amount per day into the upper limit of the game machine, and then put the remainder to the customers in cash.

As a result, the defendant provided a game machine whose rating is refused, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. shall engage in speculative acts as his/her business using speculative gaming machines;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, installed 13 games, which are speculative gaming machines having the same function as shown in the foregoing paragraph, provided the said games to customers, and exchanged them in the above manner upon receiving a request for exchange from customers.

As a result, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities using similar organizations that give financial benefits or losses to customers according to the outcome of friendship.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. E.