logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고단2498
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has committed the following crimes under the status that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the trophal cerebral cerebral Bribery:

[2014 Highest 2498]

1. On August 17, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendant stolen the victim C’s property in the aggregate amount of KRW 30,600,000, by inserting one brush, one brush, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 5,500, and one brush, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 2,000, and one brush, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 16,110, and one brush, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 30,60,00, in the way of inserting the brush in Australia.

2. From August 17, 2014, the Defendant thefted the victim F in a manner that, within the H located in G in Kimhae-si on August 16:45, 2014, the victim F, who was the head of the security team, was unable to manage the victim F, was stolen in a way that the victim F, who was in oral burial, went out of the burial, was kept out of the burial, by taking out the oral one point of the market value equivalent to 59,00 won.

[2014 Highest 299]

1. 절도 피고인은 2014. 8. 20. 09:37경 김해시 가락로 272 후야제1빌딩에 있는 농협 내 공과금 자동납부기기에서, 피해자 I가 그녀의 남편인 J 명의의 농협 직불카드로 공과금 납부 업무를 본 다음 깜박 잊고 카드를 두고 간 것을 발견하고 이를 가져가 절취하였다.

2. On August 20, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, purchased two pieces of tobacco in an amount equivalent to KRW 54,00,00 from M, operated by the victim L in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, and settled the transaction by presenting the agricultural debit card in the name of J, which was stolen as referred to in the above 1. The Defendant acquired the above property from the victim and used the stolen debit card.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to I and F;

1. Each written statement L and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, respectively;

arrow