logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.18 2014고정960
범인도피
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant AD’s actual operator of “AR Co., Ltd.” in Gyeonggi-si Agu, and Defendant AD, around April 2009, was indicted for violating the Clean Air Conservation Act and pending trial by installing and operating a charcoal, which is an air pollutant emission facility, without reporting to the competent authority.

Accordingly, there is concern that Defendant AD will be subject to aggravated punishment if it is re-control of the same crime, and that Defendant A asked Defendant A, the obligee of Defendant AD, the actual operator of Defendant AD, that Defendant A was responsible for installing and operating non-reported air pollutants emission facilities.

On April 30, 2009, upon the request of the defendant AD, the defendant A signed a written confirmation of the violation that the defendant A was operating and operating the above friendship and submitted it to AS who is a public official belonging to the Han River Basin Environment Office.

As a result, Defendant AD has instigated Defendant A to escape from Defendant A who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. On April 30, 2009, Defendant A signed a false statement of violation with the purport that Defendant A was actually operating the said letter to the public official AS belonging to the Han River Basin Environment Office, who visited the said letter upon the request of Defendant AD, even though Defendant AD installed and operated the Gama, which is an emission facility of the unreported air pollutants, in operating the “AR Co., Ltd.” in Q Q of Gyeonggi-si, Defendant A, upon receiving a request from Defendant AD, and submitted it to the said AS..

As a result, Defendant A knew that Defendant AD committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment, but caused Defendant AD to escape through the above method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date, respectively);

1. The written statement of the preparation of AT;

1. Report on detection and written confirmation of violation;

1. The investigation report (the attachment to a written judgment) 1.

arrow